苏轼散文评点于明代最为突出,尤其是至晚明时期趋于繁盛,涌现出众多苏文评本与评家。明人主要对苏轼散文的艺术特色从理论上作了总结和把握,并借此阐明苏文的成就及苏轼对散文的贡献,综而观之,虽无开拓创新之举,却也有发扬光大之功,从而进一步确立了苏轼的文学史地位。这也使明代苏轼研究“中熄”说显得不够妥贴。 Su Shi’s essay comments on the most prominent in the Ming Dynasty, especially to the late Ming period tends to prosperous, emerged in many Su Wen critics and critics. The Ming Dynasty mainly sums up and grasps the artistic features of Su Shi’s prose in theory and illustrates Su Wen’s achievements and Su Shi’s contribution to the prose. On the whole, though there is no pioneering and innovative move, , Thus further establishing Su Shi’s literary history status. This also makes the study of Ming Dynasty Su Shi “Quench ” said was not enough properly.