论文部分内容阅读
目的:分析在急性心肌梗死治疗中直接介入疗法及溶栓后介入疗法的治疗效果。方法:选取收治的急性心肌梗死患者80例,采取抽签的方式,将其分为对照组和观察组。对照组采用直接介入疗法治疗,观察组溶栓后介入疗法治疗,对比两组的治疗效果。结果:观察组TIMI3血流及开通率、LVEF都明显高于对照组,而LVEDD明显对于对照组患者,具有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论:溶栓后介入疗法对治疗急性心肌梗死具有较好的效果。
Objective: To analyze the therapeutic effect of direct interventional therapy and interventional therapy after thrombolysis in the treatment of acute myocardial infarction. Methods: A total of 80 patients with acute myocardial infarction (AMI) were enrolled in this study. They were randomly divided into two groups: control group and observation group. The control group was treated with direct interventional therapy. The intervention group was treated with thrombolysis in the observation group, and the therapeutic effect was compared between the two groups. Results: The TIMI3 blood flow and opening rate, LVEF in the observation group were significantly higher than those in the control group, while LVEDD was significantly higher in the control group (P <0.05). Conclusion: Interventional therapy after thrombolysis has a good effect on the treatment of acute myocardial infarction.