我写那篇《‘出租羊’富了大刘庄》稿,在河南农民报一版显着位置以《大刘庄养羊中的新鲜事:“出租母羊”》为题,加报花被刊登。我把见报稿和原稿对比,感受颇深: 一是原稿题目概念不清,内容拉杂,废话多;见报稿题目新颖、醒目,文字简洁明晰。二是我在写稿时,只把“出租羊”当作一件助人为乐的好事,而没有提高到帮贫致富政策上,而见报稿开始就点出了“出租母羊”是帮扶新形式。 I wrote that article, ’Rent a sheep rich Liuzhuang’ draft, a prominent position in Henan Farmers reported a ’fresh thing in the big Liuzhuang sheep:’ rent ewe ’ Was published. I see the comparison of manuscripts and manuscripts, deep feelings: First, the concept of the original title is unclear, mixed content, nonsense and more; see the manuscript novel, eye-catching, concise and clear text. Second, when I wrote the manuscript, I only considered “renting sheep” as a good thing for helping others but did not raise the policy of helping the rich and get rich. However, when I read the manuscript, I pointed out that “rental of ewes” New form