论文部分内容阅读
恩格斯的“历史合力论”对意志的解释,主要服务于具体的历史实践解释,因而采用对经济主义批判的解释形式。这里面包含了双重意义,一方面是制定摆脱唯意志论的大纲,另一方面则表明作用于社会规则(规律)的意志来源。“历史合力论”意味着达到并深入于个人历史作用之真理的具体性,而不是坚执那种将人的意志、目的当作原因之抽象的理智观念。但是,阿尔都塞不仅没有坚持这种逻辑关系,反而将它当作意识形态来分析。恩格斯原本用于意志来源的反思上的理论,被阿尔都塞误当作用在对意志目的的思考上。是阿尔都塞而不是恩格斯混淆了真正的历史因果关系。
Engels’s “theory of history together” on the interpretation of the will, the main service in the specific interpretation of historical practice, thus adopting the interpretation of the critical form of economicism. There is a double meaning in it, both on the one hand out of the outline of voluntarism and on the other hand on the source of the will that acts on social rules. “Historical synergy” implies the concreteness of reaching and deepening the truth of personal historical function, rather than insisting on abstract intellectual ideas that take people’s will and purpose as causes. However, Althusser not only failed to adhere to this logical relationship, but instead regarded it as an ideological analysis. Engels’s original theory of the reflection on the source of the will was mistakenly used by Althusser to reflect on the purpose of the will. It is Althusser instead of Engels who confused the true historical cause and effect.