论文部分内容阅读
慈善组织合法性不仅是从法律意义而言,也包含了相对于慈善组织与法律权威性来源的讨论。慈善组织制度资本缺失使其蕴含合法性危机。文章认为,中国慈善组织制度资本缺失体现在制度性承诺的缺位、制度信任的困惑、对政府资源的过度依赖性以及慈善绩效的合法性困境等。制度资本具有自我生产性,这对于资源并不丰富的中国慈善组织可持续发展来说具有重要意义。由于中国慈善组织普遍存在官民二重性特征以及对政府组织依附性过强的特性,投资慈善制度资本更能体现这种资本的价值性。
The legitimacy of charitable organizations is not only legal in terms of terms, but also contains a relative to the charitable organization and the legal authority of the source of discussion. The absence of capital in charitable organizations implies legitimacy crisis. The article argues that the absence of institutional capital in China’s charities is reflected in the absence of institutional commitment, the confusion of institutional trust, the excessive dependence on government resources and the dilemma of the legitimacy of charitable performance. Institutional capital is self-productive, which is of great significance to the sustainable development of Chinese charitable organizations which are not rich in resources. Due to the prevalence of charitable organizations in China and the dual characteristics of government organizations and dependencies too strong, investment charitable capital more reflects the value of this capital.