论文部分内容阅读
钩沉晚近几年来的小型叙事面貌,其一是为盘查小型叙事批评话语及其方式,建立一个可靠的具体语境;其二是为着摸清小型叙事者的知识资源,或者审美资源。现在,究竟该怎样解释这两个问题呢?如果要彻底弄清这两个问题,我发现,必须有一段较长的回顾,否则,无法解释清楚。为什么呢?即便以晚近以来的小型叙事批评话语为原点,的确是很难说清究竟是批评先于创作,还是创作先于批评的。充斥于各个报章杂志版面的文学批评文章,基本是同质的和同步出现的,这一点,尤其不同于20世纪50、60年代、80年代,甚至90年代也要比现在清晰得多。前三个
One of the small narrative aspects of recent years has been the establishment of a reliable and specific context for discourse and mode of discourse on small narratives. The second is to find out the intellectual resources or aesthetic resources of small narrators. Now, exactly how these two problems should be explained? If we want to thoroughly understand these two issues, I find that there must be a long review or I can not explain it clearly. Why? Even taking the narrative discourse of small narratives as the starting point in recent history as a starting point, it is indeed hard to say whether criticism precedes creation or creation precedes criticism. The literary criticism articles that fill the pages of newspapers and magazines are basically homogeneous and synchronous. This is especially different from that in the 1950s, 1960s, 1980s and even 1990s. The first three