论文部分内容阅读
《五经大全》是明初官方组织编纂的重要经学丛书。该书以宋儒经学传注的影响力为标准,对宋元经说进行了系统的整理总结,并将其各个分册按照《易》、《书》、《诗》、《春秋》、《礼》的顺序进行排列。这种不同于传统“五经”排序的新编次,反映了明初学者对宋元经说全面总结、区别对待的学术态度,代表了明初经学的特点。清代学者没有认识到《五经大全》的编次意图,甚至依据清人自身的学术标准破坏了该书的原貌,让后世学者在插架、著录、称引、研究该书时产生了同样的偏差,使《五经大全》的真实面貌和学术价值被长期埋没。本文利用文献与实物证据,考辨《五经大全》的原初编次;利用图书馆插架与馆藏目录的编制恢复此书的原貌,既是古籍整理的必要工作,也将有助于对《五经大全》和明代经学的深入研究。
“Wu Quan Da Quan” is an important series of books compiled by official organizations in the early Ming Dynasty. The book takes the influence of Song Confucian classics as the standard, and systematically summarizes the theory of the Song and Yuan dynasties. According to the book Yi, Book, Poetry, Spring and Autumn, Order arrangement. This new edition, different from the traditional “Five Classics”, reflects the academic attitude of scholars in the early Ming Dynasty about the comprehensive summary and discrimination of the Song and Yuan Dynasties, which represented the characteristics of the early Ming Confucian classics. The scholars of Qing Dynasty did not realize the intension of the “Five Classics and the Encyclopedia”, even ruined the original appearance of the book according to the academic standards of the Qing Dynasty, so that later generations of scholars produced the same Deviation, so that the “Five Classics” the true face and academic value has long been buried. In this paper, the use of literature and physical evidence to test the original edition of “Wu Jing Da Quan”; the use of library jumble and the establishment of catalogs to restore the original appearance of this book is not only the necessary work of sorting ancient books, will also help to “Wu Jing Da Quan ”And the Ming dynasty scholarship in-depth study.