论文部分内容阅读
从新中国建国迄今为止,已经陆续在1954年、1975年、1978年和1980年颁布了四部宪法,这标志着我国的宪法在不断的改革中走向完善和成熟,但是却依然没有构建与宪法相对应的宪法诉讼制度,这使得我国宪法只沦为一个纲领性的文件,从而缺乏由理论到实践,由宪法效力到司法实施的能力。宪法是国家建设和人权保障的总章程,在法律体系之中占据着最高地位,固然在现实中有法律、行政法规和规章等对宪法的实施进行部分诠释,然而却在程序上架空了宪法对违宪问题进行追究的能力。本文试通过对法国宪法委员会制度的分析,与我国的国情加以结合,尝试着为拓宽我国违宪审查的路径和提供借鉴的依据。
Since the founding of New China so far, four constitutions have been promulgated in 1954, 1975, 1978 and 1980, which indicates that our country’s constitution has been perfected and matured in the continuous reform. However, there is still no constitution corresponding to the constitution The system of constitutional litigation, which makes our constitution only reduced to a programmatic document, which lacks from theory to practice, from the constitutional effectiveness to the judicial implementation of the ability. Constitution is the general constitution of national construction and protection of human rights and occupies the highest position in the legal system. Although there are some laws, administrative regulations and rules in reality that partially explain the implementation of the Constitution, Violation of constitutional issues to investigate the ability. Through the analysis of the French constitutional commission system, this paper attempts to combine with the national conditions of our country and try to broaden the path of China’s constitutional review and provide references for its reference.