论文部分内容阅读
本文回顾了20世纪20年代以来行政史研究的起落。不同时代的研究内容清单表明,行政史仍然还不是一门学科,仅仅是散落在一系列学科中的研究主题。本文认为,重建行政史研究的努力在公共行政学体系的建设中是不容忽视的。行政史可以在行政组织、行政过程以及行政官员这三个公共行政的基本概念上进行构建,并将理论实证、历史社会学以及分析性叙事的研究方法贯穿始终,从而在理论建构和社会演进中铺设一条与政治制度变迁的平行线。当前,行政史研究在欧洲公共行政学界已经呈现出再次复兴的态势,我们理应在公共行政的学术视角下,挖掘中国行政史所具有的文明价值和制度意义,使其在行政史研究复兴的过程中更具有世界意义。
This article reviews the ups and downs of administrative history research since the 1920s. The list of the research contents from different times shows that the administrative history is still not a subject and merely the subject of study scattered in a series of disciplines. This paper argues that the efforts to rebuild the history of the study of administration can not be ignored in the construction of the system of public administration. The history of administration can be constructed on the basic concepts of administrative organization, administrative process and administrative officials, and the research methods of theoretical demonstration, historical sociology and analytical narration are carried through from beginning to end, so that in the theoretical construction and social evolution Lay a parallel with changes in the political system. At present, the study of administrative history has shown a revival again in the field of public administration in Europe. Under the academic perspective of public administration, we should excavate the civilization value and system significance of China’s administrative history so that it can be used in the process of the rejuvenation of administrative history In the more global significance.