论文部分内容阅读
目前我国的相关法律对加害给付及其责任有零散的规定,但这些规定比较粗糙,缺乏完整、清晰的统一规定,不利于对债权人合法权益的保护。对加害给付的救济应该从其所造成的实际损害出发,如果对固有利益以侵权为由主张权利的话,应同时对履行利益主张违约责任,只不过在提起诉讼时要一起主张该两项诉讼请求,从而避免“一事再理”和节约司法资源。另外,在立法中规定对于发生在某些类型合同履行过程中的加害给付所造成的精神损害赔偿可以给与合同法上的救济,以对债权人的利益提供充分、周全的保护。
At present, the relevant laws in our country provide sporadic provisions on injury-inflicting damages and their liabilities. However, these provisions are rather crude and lack a complete and clear uniform rule, which is not conducive to the protection of the legitimate rights and interests of creditors. The remedy for injuring should start from the actual damage caused by it. If the inherent interest is claimed on the ground of infringement, it should also assume the responsibility of breach of contract for the fulfillment of the interests at the same time, except to claim the two claims together , So as to avoid “re-thinking” and save judicial resources. In addition, the legislation stipulates that the compensation for mental damages caused by the injurious injunctions occurring in the performance of certain types of contracts may be given remedies under the contract law so as to provide adequate and comprehensive protection for the interests of creditors.