论文部分内容阅读
新文化运动以后,中国的文史学术界大致分为南北两大系统,以“新”、“旧”为重要分野。其中,位于南京的东南大学多被视为南方“旧学”的重镇。1927年南京国民政府成立后,东南大学改组为国立中央大学(第四中山大学)。从东南大学到中央大学,该校史学系的师资结构大有调整,学术风格也有很大变化。但在这些变化的背后,系内主要教授都存“史学南派”的认同。这种认同并不源于初始期间的“疑古/信古”或“科学/人文”之争,而更多地落实在“学术传统”的延续性上。“学派”的分际更多地表现本学科欲在学界独树一帜、与他人立异的层面上。同时,现实权力之争也是其中一个重要的影响因素。
After the New Culture Movement, the academic circles of Chinese history and literature were broadly divided into two major systems of north and south, with “new” and “old” as the important divisions. Among them, the Southeast University in Nanjing is often regarded as the southern city of “old school”. After the establishment of the Nanjing National Government in 1927, Southeast University was reorganized as the National Central University (the fourth Sun Yat-sen University). From Southeast University to Central University, the faculty structure of the Department of History has been greatly adjusted, and its academic style has also undergone great changes. However, behind these changes, the major professors in the department all hold the recognition of “historiography and southern school”. This identity does not originate from the dispute between “suspicion / belief” or “science / humanity” in the initial period, but more on the continuity of “academic tradition”. “School ” of the division more to express the discipline to be unique in academia, innovation with others on the level. At the same time, the real power struggle is also one of the most important factors.