由于经典格赖斯会话含义理论将交际内容划分为所言和所含,导致了后格赖斯语用学关于语义学和语用学的界面之争。本文在系统阐述格赖斯对所言和所含的划分及其缺陷的基础上,着重分析后格赖斯语用学中5种意义划分模式即卡斯顿模式、利卡纳提模式、巴赫模式、列文森模式和雅兹寇尔特模式的区别,并指出各模式存在的问题。 Due to the classical Grice’s theory of conversational implicature, the communicative content is divided into two parts, which leads to the controversy of post-Gricean pragmatics on semantics and pragmatics. Based on the systematic description of Grice’s classification and its defects, this article focuses on the analysis of the five types of meaning division in Post-Gricean pragmatics: the Karsten model, the Lecanatti model, the Bach Model, the difference between Levinson’s model and Yazid’s model, and points out the problems in each mode.