论文部分内容阅读
等置性是处罚不纯正不作为犯的重要依据,此问题的提出对解决罪刑法定与不纯正不作为犯的矛盾提供了法理支撑。对等置性的定位,应当在三阶层的犯罪论中进行考虑,具体来说应当纳入构成要件之中,且是一个独立的构成要件要素。在等置性问题的判断上,应当以形式上的作为义务为判断对象,考虑行为人的原因设定、危险设定以及对结果的支配性,以此严格限制不纯正不作为犯的成立范围。
Isomerism is an important basis for the punishment of impure innocence. The proposition of this question provides the legal support for resolving the contradiction between the statutory and impure omissions. The positioning of the equivalence should be considered in the third-level crime theory, specifically, it should be included in the constitutional requirements and be an independent element of the constitutional requirements. In the judgments of equivalence problems, the formal obligation should be taken as the judgment object, the actor’s reason setting, the risk setting and the dominance of the result should be considered, so as to strictly limit the establishment scope of impure omission .