论文部分内容阅读
目的比较微量泵泵入与间断静脉推注阿托品治疗有机磷中毒的临床疗效。方法选取2014年7月—2015年7月广西钦州市钦南区人民医院收治的有机磷中毒患者50例,按临床治疗方法不同分为观察组与对照组,各25例。观察组患者予以微量泵泵入阿托品治疗,对照组患者予以间断静脉推注阿托品治疗。观察两组患者临床疗效、并发症发生情况及治疗前后满意度评分。结果观察组患者总有效率高于对照组,并发症发生率低于对照组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05);治疗前两组患者满意度评分比较,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05),治疗后观察组患者满意度评分及上升幅度高于对照组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论微量泵泵入阿托品治疗有机磷中毒的临床疗效好于间断静脉推注阿托品治疗,且并发症少,满意度高。
Objective To compare the clinical efficacy of micropump pump and intermittent intravenous injection of atropine in the treatment of organophosphate poisoning. Methods From July 2014 to July 2015, 50 cases of organophosphate poisoning patients admitted to Qinan District People’s Hospital of Qinzhou City, Guangxi Province were divided into observation group and control group with 25 cases in each group according to different clinical treatment methods. Patients in the observation group were treated with micropump pump into atropine, and patients in the control group were treated with intermittent intravenous injection of atropine. Clinical efficacy, complications and satisfaction scores before and after treatment were observed in two groups. Results The total effective rate of the observation group was higher than that of the control group, the complication rate was lower than that of the control group, the difference was statistically significant (P <0.05). There was no significant difference in satisfaction score between the two groups before treatment (P> 0.05). After treatment, the patients in the observation group had higher satisfaction scores and increased rates than those in the control group (P <0.05). Conclusion The clinical efficacy of micropump pump into atropine in the treatment of organophosphate poisoning is better than intermittent intravenous injection of atropine, with less complications and high satisfaction.