论文部分内容阅读
本文在简述香港双边投资条约(bilateral investment treaty,BIT)实践沿革的基础上,较细致地分析了其适用范围、投资待遇、“剥夺”及赔偿标准、争端的解决等主要条款,进而探讨香港缔约权的授权性质及其国际承认的依据问题,以及香港BIT实践衍生的条约适用问题。本文指出,香港BIT实践遵循了传统模式,因其非主权实体地位,亦具有一些重要特征;香港BIT的授权规定进一步明确表明了香港缔约权的授权性质,缔约对方和国际社会承认香港缔约主体地位的决定性法律依据是中国宪法;香港BIT实践衍生的条约适用已然成为现实问题,需要认真加以防范。
On the basis of a brief account of the practice of the BIT, the article analyzes in detail the major provisions such as its scope of application, investment treatment, “deprivation ” and the standard of compensation, and the settlement of disputes. Explore the nature of the authorizations of Hong Kong’s treaty powers and the basis for their international recognition, and the application of treaties derived from the practice of BIT in Hong Kong. This article points out that Hong Kong’s BIT practice follows the traditional model and possesses some important features because of its status as a non-sovereign entity. Hong Kong BIT’s authorization provisions further clarify the authorized nature of Hong Kong’s contracting power. The other contracting parties and the international community recognize the status of contracting parties in Hong Kong The decisive legal basis is the Chinese constitution; the application of the treaties derived from Hong Kong’s BIT practice has become a real issue and needs to be carefully prevented.