论文部分内容阅读
清代常州派与宋代词评家在词学理论、词评视角和创作主体与词评主体的关系等方面存在明显的不同。宋代词评家将词评放开在整个文化背景上看词的优势与不足,清代常州派词评家将词评放到与宋比较的格局中而论词;宋代词评伴随创作而展开,清代词评则与浙西派比照中来进行;宋代词评是先作者后评论,主张创作先行;清代是先学者后创作,创作往往是主张的演义。
The Changzhou School in the Qing Dynasty and the Ci-critics in the Song Dynasty had obvious differences in terms of the theory of Ci-poetry, the perspective of Ci-poetry and the relationship between the subject of creation and the subject of Ci-poetry. The Song Ci critics opened the review on the advantages and disadvantages of the whole cultural background, while in the Qing Dynasty, the Ci commentators in Changzhou commented on the comparison of the Ci and the Song, The Ci commentaries in the Qing Dynasty were compared with those in the west of Zhejiang. The Ci poetry criticism in the Song Dynasty was the first author’s post-commentary, which advocated creation first.