论文部分内容阅读
美国建国初期,一部分政治精英强调,社会精英管理和经营的商业公司能推动社会“共同福祉”。在建立商业公司的具体操作上,要借助社会精英的私人财产,并将商业公司界定为公共机构。在他们眼中,私人财产不仅关系到物质所有和独立人格,而且被赋予了政治属性。然而,更多的人却将私有财产看作追求经济利益的资源,反对赋予私有财产政治属性。在不同财产观念的碰撞中,对私人财产的认知也发生了变化,进而推动了对商业公司界定的转变。
In the early days of the founding of the United States, some political elites emphasized that commercial companies managed and run by the social elites can promote social “common blessings.” The concrete operation of establishing a commercial company involves using the private property of the social elite and defining the commercial company as a public institution. In their eyes, private property is not only related to material possessions and independent personalities but is also given political attributes. However, more people see private property as a resource for pursuing economic interests and oppose giving the political property of private property. In the collision of different concepts of property, the recognition of private property has also changed, thus promoting the change of definition of commercial companies.