论文部分内容阅读
以生态效益最大化为决策准则,分析制造商负责回收、零售商负责回收和第三方负责回收3种模式的最优回收率、产品价格和企业利润,得出零售商回收模式相对最佳。在再制造活动经济与不经济两种情况下,对3种模式的整体绩效进行比较,得出再制造节约对系统影响较大,政府应采取措施激励制造商通过产品创新设计出可再制造水平高的产品,实现企业、社会和环境的多赢。
Taking the maximization of ecological benefits as the decision criterion, the author analyzes the optimal recovery rate, product price and enterprise profit of the three models that the manufacturer is responsible for recycling, the retailer is responsible for recycling and the third party is responsible for recycling. The conclusion is that the retailer’s recycling model is the best. Remanufacturing in both economic and economic conditions, the overall performance of the three models are compared, concluded that remanufacturing savings have a greater impact on the system, the government should take measures to encourage manufacturers to design through the product innovation to create the level of re-manufacturing High products, enterprises, social and environmental win-win.