论文部分内容阅读
在以经济建设为中心的现阶段,档案工作要为经济建设服务已是档案界的共识。“经济建设发展到哪里,档案工作就延伸到哪里”。“档案工作要面向经济建设的主战场”等提法也已成为广大档案工作者所熟悉的口号。尽管人们如此强调档案工作为经济建设服务,但档案用于经济建设的比例仍是很低的。据国家档案局综合科教司发表的统计数字,1991年中央、省、地、县四级综合馆档案用于经济建设的比例分别为0.3％、1.7％、9.9％、8.5％。许多人都认为这说明档案部门还没有转变观念,还不能适应市场经济的要求,还没有尽力为经济建设服务。我想,除了上述原因之外,更主要的原因恐怕是档案工作自身规律和特点的限制,使得档案工作为经济建设服务不可能完全按照人们的主观愿望而进行。从这个意义上说,档案用于经济建设的比例偏低,也有其存在的某种合理性,并不等于说档案部门不重视为经济建设服务。
At the present stage of taking economic construction as the center, it is the consensus of the archives sector that filing work should serve the economic construction. “Where is the development of economic construction, where the file work extends?” “Archives work to face the main battlefield of economic construction,” and other references have become the archdiocese familiar with the archivists. Although people stress the importance of archival work in economic construction, the proportion of archives used for economic construction is still very low. According to statistics released by the Bureau of Comprehensive Archives and Science of the State Archives Bureau, in 1991, the proportions of the archives of the four-state comprehensive museums at the central, provincial, prefectural and county levels for economic construction were 0.3%, 1.7%, 9.9% and 8.5% respectively. Many people think that this shows that the file department has not changed its concept and yet can not meet the requirements of a market economy and has not tried its best to serve economic construction. I think besides these reasons, the more important reason is probably the limitation of the regularities and characteristics of the file work itself. It is impossible for the file work to serve the economic construction in exactly the people’s subjective desire. In this sense, the low proportion of archives used for economic construction and the existence of some kind of rationality do not mean that the archival departments do not attach importance to serving economic construction.