论文部分内容阅读
作为传统法律推理最后沉淀的清代法律推理在界定案件事实的过程中独具特色。通过考察清代判决文书可以发现,刑事案件事实界定的特色在于对必然因果关系的否定;而民事案件事实界定的特色即对个体意思表示的否定。清代法律推理如此界定案件事实,其原因即在于适用于案件的清代法律的规范结构,最终则归结于清代刑民法律的逻辑基础的相关性,即清代法律中“人”的形象系不可通约的身份。因此,清代法律推理中案件事实界定独具特色从而也就有了与现代不同的法律推理特色。
As the last precipitation of traditional legal reasoning, Qing legal reasoning is unique in defining the facts of the case. Through examining the verdict of the Qing Dynasty, it can be found that the demarcation of the facts of criminal cases lies in the negation of the inevitable causality, while the demarcation of the facts of civil cases is the denial of the expression of individual meanings. The reason of the Qing Dynasty legal reasoning defines the facts of the case in this way is that the normative structure of the Qing law applicable to the case is finally attributed to the relevance of the logical basis of the criminal law of the Qing Dynasty, The image is not compatible with the identity. Therefore, the definition of the facts of the case in the legal reasoning of the Qing Dynasty has its own characteristics of legal reasoning different from the modern one.