论文部分内容阅读
“义理”、“考据”二词原非一对范畴,造成其在几个向度上的区别并不具有无条件的一致性。“考据”指利用文献资料所做的专题研究,“义理”起初泛指各种社会行为准则和观念,虽可以简驭繁,但比天人性命具体。二者转为一对范畴是初始涵义、经学逻辑以及认知策略等多重因素造成的。在文本诠释领域,“义理”原与“文章”、“章句”相对,后者接近于经书本文。经书“本文”而非经书中适合考据的内容,代表着经学诠释中“殊相”、“部分”的一极;“义理”、“考据”都围绕本文展开,考据活动的共相性取向由此彰显。在一个五要素的文本诠释理论模型中,考据活动足以与阅读活动等价,所以存在“关于义理问题的考据”。
“Justice ”, “Textual Criticism ” is not a pair of original category, resulting in several differences in the degree of its does not have unconditional consistency. “Textual Criticism ” refers to the use of the literature to do thematic research, “Justice ” refers to all kinds of social codes of conduct and concepts initially, though can simplify the complex, but specific to the human life. The conversion of the two into a pair of categories is caused by multiple factors such as initial implication, logic of learning and cognitive strategies. In the field of textual interpretation, “justice ” the original and “article ”, “chapter sentence ” as opposed to the latter close to the book. The book “This ” rather than suitable for the textual content of the test, representing the interpretation of the classics “special phase ”, “part ” of the pole; “justice ”, “textual research” are around this article Expand, test activity based on the generality of this show. In a five-element textual interpretation theory model, the test activity is sufficient to be equivalent to the reading activity, so there is a “test of justice”.