论文部分内容阅读
有这样三位平素关系要好的朋友,各出资100元凑到一起,购买了150张体育彩票,随后三人平分这150张。结果,甲分得的50张中有两张中了大奖。乙、丙二人的彩票只有几张中了小奖。随即乙、丙人主张,这150张彩票为三人共同出资购买,中奖机会均等,甲中得的大奖,三人应该平均分配。甲则不同意,认为彩票已分开,谁的彩票中奖,就应归谁,其他人不得干涉,为此三人产生了纠纷。
There are three such friendships that usually have a good relationship with each other. Each of them contributes 100 yuan to buy together 150 sports lotteries, followed by three 150-part split. As a result, two out of the 50 cards in the lottery won the big prize. B, C two lottery only a few small prize. Then B, c advocate that the 150 lottery for the three co-financing to buy, equal opportunity to win, a prize in the middle, the three should be evenly distributed. A does not agree, that the lottery has been separated, who won the lottery, it should be owned by others, others shall not interfere with the three had a dispute.