论文部分内容阅读
《刑法》第306条所规定的律师伪证罪,由于存在着立法旨意偏差、罪状表述不清、相关法条竞合等立法缺陷,在司法实践操作过程中造成一系列问题。为贯彻控辩平等和存疑有利于被告人的原则,有必要着手对《刑法》第306条进行相应路径调整,取消其纯正身份犯地位,与《刑法》第307条合并,将律师与司法工作人员共同作为妨害作证罪和帮助毁灭、伪造证据罪的不真正身份犯的主体,在打击律师违反职业道德的非法行为与保障辩护人合法权利之间寻求合理平衡。
The perjury of the law stipulated in Article 306 of the Criminal Law poses a series of problems in the course of judicial practice because of legislative imperfections such as deviations of legislative purposes, unclear statements of guilt, and the competition of relevant laws. In order to carry out the principle of equality of accuser and prosecutor and doubts in favor of the defendant, it is necessary to proceed with the corresponding path adjustment of Article 306 of the Criminal Law, cancel its pure status of criminal status, merge with Article 307 of the Criminal Law, combine lawyer and judicial work As the main body of untrue identity criminals that hinder the testifying crime and help to destroy and falsify the evidence, the staff should strike a reasonable balance between cracking down the lawyers’ violation of professional ethics and safeguarding the legal rights of the defender.