论文部分内容阅读
针对长期以来 ,我国刑、民事诉讼中均坚持“事实清楚 ,证据确实充分”同一的证明标准。本文通过介绍辛普森案刑、民事诉讼不同的判决 ,指出刑事诉讼应坚持“排除合理怀疑”的证明标准 ,民事诉讼应坚持“优势证据证明”的证明标准。并分析了刑、民事诉讼证明标准差异的原因及坚持刑、民事诉讼不同的证明标准对司法实践和未来证据立法的启示意义。
For a long time, China’s criminal and civil litigation all adhere to the “fact is clear, the evidence is indeed sufficient,” the same standard of proof. By introducing the different judgments of Simpson ’s case and civil procedure, this paper points out that the criminal procedure should adhere to the standard of “excluding reasonable doubt”, and the civil lawsuit should adhere to the proof standard of “evidence of superiority”. And analyzes the reason of the difference between the standard of proof of criminal procedure and civil procedure, as well as the significance of insisting on the different standard of proof in criminal procedure and civil procedure to the judicial practice and legislation of future evidence.