“政治宪法学”与“规范宪法学”各自割据,争论不休;政治宪法学内部派别林立,舌战笔伐。以非常政治概念为前提的政治宪法学,型构不出自由主义的社会秩序。倾向于自由主义的政治宪法学叙事不畅;政治宪法学的自由主义之路荆棘丛生。内生性自由主义需要更多“价值”思考,对“政治”事实的关切,无法回应内生性自由主义的追问。 “Political constitution ” and “normative constitutional law ” their respective separatism, endless debate; political constitutional school within the various factional, verbal strokes. The political constitution, based on the very political concept, can not constitute a liberal social order. The political constitution that tends to liberalism is poorly narrated; the liberalism of political constitutional science is thorny. Endogenous liberalism needs more “value ” thinking, “political ” the fact concerns, can not respond to endogenous liberalism’s questioning.