论文部分内容阅读
毋庸置疑,历史背景是日常教学和考试中普遍使用的高频词语。然而,究竟什么是历史背景?或者说,完整意义上的历史背景由哪些要素构成?又体现了哪些思维品质?对此,我们往往熟知却未必深解,认识上的误区必然导致行为上的混乱,以至于在应试中产生误判。从2016年高考全国卷Ⅰ第31题答题情况来看,在面对历史背景的考查时,暴露出了思维短板和教学软肋,其中折射的问题值得我们警醒和深思。试题呈现如下:1965年,中国大陆与西方国家的贸易额在进出口总额中所占的比重,由1957年17.9%上升到
Undoubtedly, the historical background is commonly used in everyday teaching and examinations of high-frequency words. However, what are the historical backgrounds? Or what elements do historical backgrounds in the complete sense and which quality of thinking are we? Often, we are not familiar with but may not understand. Misunderstandings in cognition necessarily lead to behavioral confusion. , So that mistakes in the examination. Judging from the answers to the 31st Question of the National Vol. I in 2016, when examining the historical background, the shortcomings of thinking and teaching are exposed. Refraction issues deserve our vigilance and reflection. The questions are presented as follows: In 1965, the share of trade between China and Western countries in total imports and exports rose from 17.9% in 1957 to