论文部分内容阅读
案件基本事实本案原告为某商务有限公司,是某跨国服饰采购中心项目的建设单位,被告为某特级施工企业。2004年1月14日,原告采用邀请招标的方式向不包括被告在内的四家施工企业发出了《某跨国服饰采购中心项目工程施工招标文件》。同年1月26日至28日,上述四家施工企业向原告发出了投标书,经过评标,四家中的一家被评为第一名。但原告未当场定标,嗣后也未在投标的四家施工企业中确定中标者。2004年2月9日,原告向被告发出了“中标通知书”。2004年2月15日,原、被告签订了《某跨国服饰采
The basic facts of the case The plaintiff is a business limited company, is a transnational clothing procurement center construction unit, the defendant is a special construction enterprise. On January 14, 2004, the plaintiff sent an invitation to bid for bidding documents for construction of a multinational apparel procurement center to four construction enterprises that did not include the defendant. The same year, January 26 to 28, the above four construction companies issued a tender to the plaintiff, after the bid evaluation, one of the four was named first. However, the plaintiff did not mark the spot and subsequently failed to identify the successful bidder among the four construction enterprises bidding. On February 9, 2004, the plaintiff issued the “Notice of Successful Bid” to the defendant. February 15, 2004, the original, the defendant signed a "cross-border apparel mining