论文部分内容阅读
【裁判要旨】行为人未成年时的抢劫犯罪记录被依法封存,其成年后又实施抢夺行为的,对其抢夺行为应单独评价,按照刑法关于抢夺罪定罪量刑标准进行处罚,而不应适用最高人民法院、最高人民检察院《关于办理抢夺刑事案件适用法律若干问题的解释》中关于追诉标准减半的规定。□案号一审:(2015)汕金法刑初字第254号二审:(2015)汕中法刑一终字第87号
[Purpose of the Referee] The robbery crime record of the actor when he was a minor is sealed up according to law, and his behavior of robbing after his adult life should be evaluated separately for his robbery behavior, punished in accordance with the criminal law on the sentencing standards for the crime of robbery, and should not be applied to the highest People’s Court, Supreme People’s Procuratorate, “on the handling of snatch the criminal law applicable to the interpretation of a number of issues” on the prosecution standard halved provisions. □ Case No. First instance: (2015) Shantou Jin Sha Chu Zi No. 254 Second instance: (2015) Shansi law sentence a final word No. 87