作者王致新的答复编辑同志：转来的＂意见＂已收到，现答复如下：１原文中公式（８）确实有误，应改为相应的应将（９）及（１０）式分别改为经查底稿，发现系抄稿时的错误，在校对时亦未发现和及时改正。由于这几个公式是该文最后推荐使用的公式，所以这个错误可能对使用... Reply of the author Wang Zhixin Editorial comrade: The “opinion” has been received. The reply is as follows: 1 Formula (8) in the original text is indeed wrong. It should be replaced by the corresponding formula (9) and (10) respectively. After checking the manuscript, he found that the manuscript was wrong at the time of the manuscript, and he had not found and corrected it in time for proofreading. Since these formulas are the formulas that were finally recommended for use in this paper, this error may be used...