沃森选择任务表明在实际推理中人们普遍使用肯定后件式这一无效的演绎推理形式,这似乎说明逻辑不能刻画人的实际思维状态。然而,在逻辑行动主义的视角下区分心智行动及其产品这两个不同的层次,则可以消除这种误解。该任务的哲学价值在于其在一定程度上构成了对反驳KK论题的一种证据支持。 The task of Watson’s selection shows that people generally use the inevitable deductive form of affirmative aftermath in practical reasoning, which seems to indicate that logic can not characterize the actual state of mind of a person. However, the distinction between mental actions and their products, at the level of logical activism, can eliminate this misunderstanding. The philosophical value of this task is that it, to some extent, forms a corollary of the argument against the KK.