论文部分内容阅读
目的分析早期干预防治围生期高危儿神经发育异常的临床效果。方法 35例围生期高危儿作为研究组,35例正常分娩的健康新生儿作为常规组,对常规组新生儿实施基础健康训练与指导,对研究组围生期高危儿则采取早期干预。比较分析两组新生儿神经行为测定(NBNA)评分情况。结果出生时,研究组NBNA评分(31.62±3.14)分明显低于常规组(38.52±1.75)分,差异具有统计学意义(P<0.05);1个月后,研究组NBNA评分(37.56±1.67)分有大幅度提升,但与常规组(39.28±1.46)分比较,差异具有统计学意义(P<0.05);2个月后,研究组NBNA评分(39.92±1.73)分非常接近正常水平,且与常规组(40.00±1.12)分比较,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。结论对围生期高危儿实施早期干预,能够较好地促进患儿神经发育,有效防治脑损伤,在临床上有较大的推广使用价值。
Objective To analyze the clinical effect of early intervention in preventing and treating perinatal high-risk neurodevelopmental abnormalities. Methods 35 cases of perinatal high-risk children as the study group, 35 normal birth healthy newborns as a routine group, the conventional group of newborns basic health training and guidance, the study group of high-risk infants perinatal intervention to take early intervention. Comparative analysis of neonatal neural behavior test (NBNA) score. Results At birth, the NBNA score (31.62 ± 3.14) in the study group was significantly lower than that in the conventional group (38.52 ± 1.75), and the difference was statistically significant (P <0.05). After 1 month, the NBNA score (37.56 ± 1.67 ) Had a significant increase, but the difference was statistically significant (P <0.05) compared with the routine group (39.28 ± 1.46); NBNA score (39.92 ± 1.73) in the study group was very close to the normal level after 2 months, Compared with the control group (40.00 ± 1.12), the difference was not statistically significant (P> 0.05). Conclusions Early intervention in high-risk infants in perinatal period can better promote the neurodevelopment of children and prevent and cure brain injury effectively. It has great value in clinic application.