惯常的认识里,高考作文的审题是要经过分门别类才能得以进行的,诸如命题非命题、供料非供料、话题非话题等。其实,高考作文无论怎样审题,如果仅仅着眼于试题的外部,不能落到内涵的“窠臼”的话,那也都只能是蜻蜓点水、隔靴搔痒,甚至是舍本逐末,南辕北辙。一、惟命是从前些年,盛行“淡化审题”之说,于是,不少考生就以为高考作文已不需要审题。其实,这是彻头彻尾的误解。高考作文从来都没有“淡化审题”过,甚至,连降低审题门槛的 In the customary understanding, the examination questions of the college entrance examination essay are to be carried out after sorting, such as proposition non-proposition, feeding non-feeding, topic non-topic and so on. In fact, regardless of how the essay is examined, if you only focus on the outside of the questions, you can’t fall into the connotation of ”窠臼”, then you can only scratch the water, get out of your boots, and even try to make it through. One, but life is from the previous years, the prevalence of “dilution trial ” theory, so many candidates think that college entrance examination composition does not require trial. In fact, this is a downright misunderstanding. The composition of the college entrance examination has never been “dimmified” or even lowered the threshold for review.