论文部分内容阅读
马克思思想中始终存在着“旁观者”视角的科学逻辑与“行动者”视角的人本逻辑之双重逻辑。但在《手稿》中基于双重视角的双重逻辑尚未达于自觉,而在很大程度上是隐含着的,且侧重于人本逻辑,而科学逻辑还比较模糊。对于双重逻辑之关系,亦未自觉到二者的不兼容之处,甚至倾向于将二者统一于人本逻辑。而在《资本论》中,马克思最终达到了对于双重逻辑之间不兼容关系的深刻理解,并主导性地显示为一种科学逻辑。但《资本论》作为对于资本主义剥削的批判,如果没有互补性的人本逻辑的支撑是不可能的,因此这只是意味着人本逻辑在科学逻辑内的消失,而非意味着在马克思后来思想中的消失。于是,《手稿》作为马克思思想的发源地,在其全部思想中便有了一种双重逻辑显性存在的特点,预示了马克思思想发展的可能范围。
There is always a double logic between the scientific logic of “bystander ” and the human logic of “actor ” in Marx’s thought. However, the dual logic based on dual perspectives in Manuscripts has not yet reached the level of self-awareness, which is largely implicit. It focuses on human logic and the scientific logic is still vague. For the relationship between the two logics, we have not yet realized the incompatibility between the two and even tended to unify the two with human logic. In Capital, Marx eventually reached a deep understanding of the incompatibility between dual logic and showed it as a kind of scientific logic. But “capitalism” as a critique of capitalist exploitation can not only mean that the human logic disappears within the logic of science without the support of the complementary humanistic logic, but it does not mean that Marx later The disappearance of thought. Thus, as the birthplace of Marx’s thought, Manuscripts has a double logical dominant existence in all its thoughts, which indicates the possible scope of the development of Marx’s thought.