考场借鉴:由表及里,见微知著日前,厦门大学的学生完成了一组实验:在同一路口摆出不同语气的交通警示标语,对比效果。结果显示,无标语组横穿率最高,达70.02%;“请走天桥”组几乎无效,横穿率69.78%;“仅多花9.4秒”组效果有限,60.96%的横穿率比无标语只下降9.06%;简单粗暴的“你丑你横穿”组效果最明显,横穿率骤降29.9%,跌至40.12%。“你丑你横穿”一语因此走红网络。这是否说明了塑造道路文明不是请客吃饭,不野蛮其标语不足以文明其行为?有不少人相信这个道理,他们创作出“你胖你闯灯”“你蠢你别车”等衍生句 The examination room draws lessons: From the table, see a little know A few days ago, Xiamen University students completed a set of experiments: at the same intersection put different traffic warning signs, contrast effect. The results showed that the highest rate of crosstalk was achieved in the no-sign language group, reaching 70.02%. The crossover rate was 69.78%, the crossover rate was 69.78%, the rate was only 9.4 seconds, the effect was limited and 60.96% Rate only dropped 9.06% compared with no slogan; simple and rough “You ugly cross you” the most obvious effect, crossing rate dropped 29.9%, fell to 40.12%. “Ugly you cross” the phrase so popular network. Does this mean that it is not a matter of patronizing to shape the road civilization? It is not savage enough that its slogan is not sufficient to justify its actions. Many people believe this truth and they have created “You fat you break the lights.” “You stupid you do not car” Derivative sentences