本文从考察马克思“亚细亚生产方式”概念的前后变化这一方法论上着手,提出在明确马克思的五种社会形态理论仅仅适用于欧洲社会演变模式的前提下,区分“亚细亚生产方式”的原生形态和次生形态,即把“亚细亚生产方式”区分为狭义和广义两种解释。这一新的思路,极有可能解决聚讼纷纭的“亚细亚生产方式”之争。 This paper starts with the methodology of examining the changes of the Marxist “Asian mode of production”, and puts forward that it is necessary to distinguish “Asian mode of production” from the basic theory of “Asian mode of production” if we make it clear that the five theories of Marx’s social theory apply only to the mode of social evolution in Europe, Of the original and secondary forms, that is, the “Asian mode of production ” is divided into two kinds of narrow and broad interpretation. This new way of thinking will most likely solve the controversy over the “Asian Production System.”