科学的客观性长期以来由理论对于实在的静态符合得以保证,从逻辑经验主义到库恩的范式,再到社会建构论,都没有走出“语义上行”的困境,使客观性成了无根之木。伊恩·哈金通过对科学史的分析,认为科学的客观性在于发展成熟的推理风格,在于历史塑造而成的行为规则。但哈金的推理风格想在科学实践中最终排除社会因素,这种片面性源于其缺少辩证法的哲学基础。 The objectivity of science has long been guaranteed by the theory of the static state of reality. From logical empiricism to Kuhn’s paradigm and then to social constructivism, there has been no excuse for the “semantic upside” and objectivity becomes Roots of wood. Ian Harkin, through the analysis of the history of science, believes that the objectivity of science lies in the mature reasoning style and the historical rules of behavior. However, Hardin’s reasoning style wants to ultimately exclude social factors in the practice of science. This one-sidedness stems from its lack of philosophical foundation of dialectics.