鉴定结论作为我国《刑事诉讼法》所规定的七种证据之一,在揭露犯罪、证明犯罪中起着不可或缺的作用。面对犯罪手段日趋多样化、智能化的严峻现实,迅猛发展的科学技术为我们提供了越来越丰富的鉴定手段,从而使鉴定结论在刑事诉讼中获得了越来越广泛的运用,而其准确性、真实性也成为备受关注的焦点问题。近年来,因鉴定结论错误导致的冤、假、错案时有发生,在这类案件中,往往是犯罪嫌疑人、被告人“拒不认罪”或先“认罪”后又“翻供”,鉴定结论往往就成为区分罪与非罪的关键证据,此证若错,全案皆错。 As one of the seven evidences stipulated in China’s “Criminal Procedure Law,” the appraisal conclusion plays an indispensable role in exposing the crime and proving the crime. In the face of increasingly diversified criminal means and the harsh reality of intelligence, the rapid development of science and technology has provided us with more and more abundant means of identification, so that the conclusion of identification has gained more and more widespread use in criminal proceedings. Accuracy, authenticity has also become the focus of much attention. In recent years, unjust, false and wrong cases resulted from the wrong conclusion of appraisals have occurred frequently. In such cases, suspects and defendants often “refuse to plead guilty” Often become the key evidence to distinguish between sin and non-sin, this card is wrong, the whole case is wrong.