论文部分内容阅读
通过对乔姆斯基等人语言哲学思想的评述,并把他们的思想与福柯等人的批评话语理论进行比较,本文试图说明:限于他们所分析的大部分话语的政治和社会性质,各种批评话语理论夸大了话语结构或意识形态对语言使用和思想自由的束缚,而乔姆斯基等人对语言使用的创造性的论述,能更有效地解释各种新的政治和社会思想产生的语言哲学根源。语言使用的创造性使人们借助有限的语言手段不断生成无限个新的表达式,新的思想伴随这些新的表达式而产生,使我们得以用新的语言和视角来谈论和理解世界并改造世界,满足我们对独创性的心智需要。
By commenting on Chomsky’s philosophy of language philosophy and comparing their thoughts with Foucault’s theory of critical discourse, this article tries to show that: limited to the political and social nature of most of the discourses they analyze, each The critique of discourse theory exaggerates the bondage of discourse structure or ideology to language use and freedom of thought, whereas Chomsky et al.’s creative discourse on the use of language can explain more effectively the consequences of various new political and social ideas The origin of language philosophy. The creative use of language has led to the continuous generation of an infinite number of new expressions by means of limited linguistic means. New ideas accompanied by these new expressions have enabled us to talk about and understand the world and transform the world in new languages and perspectives. Meet our mental needs for originality.