急性酒精中毒的中西医结合护理及实施效果探讨

来源 :中国医药指南 | 被引量 : 0次 | 上传用户:Stanleytsang627
下载到本地 , 更方便阅读
声明 : 本文档内容版权归属内容提供方 , 如果您对本文有版权争议 , 可与客服联系进行内容授权或下架
论文部分内容阅读
目的 讨论急性酒精中毒的中西医结合护理及实施效果?方法 试验病例选于2017年1月至2018年5月在我院接受诊治的急性酒精中毒患者80例,以数字盲选法均分为对照组与试验组,在治疗期间分别以常规护理与中西医结合护理模式施护,对其护理效果进行统计和分析?结果 通过对数据进行研究和分析后可知,试验组患者的治疗效果及护理满意度均较好,对照组相比之下差一些,组间数据比较有统计学差异?结论 在急性酒精中毒患者的治疗中使用中西医结合护理方式,可大大提升治疗效果,患者的护理满意度较高,该方法具有推广使用价值?“,”Objective To discuss the effect of integrated traditional Chinese and Western medicine nursing on acute alcoholism. Methods The first choice was to determine the selection object, and the selection range was determined for the patients with acute alcoholism who were treated in our hospital. Then, the sample selection time was determined from January 2017 to May 2018. The patients who used the basic routine nursing mode were arranged as the control group, and the patients who used the integrated nursing mode of traditional Chinese and Western medicine were arranged as the experimental group;sample number: 40 cases in each group. The nursing effect was analyzed. Results After the research and analysis of the data, it can be seen that the treatment effect and nursing satisfaction of the patients in the experimental group were good, the control group was worse compared, and the data had statistical differences between groups. Conclusion In the treatment of patients with acute alcoholism, the combination of traditional Chinese and Western medicine can greatly improve the therapeutic effect, and the patients\' nursing satisfaction is high, which has the value of promotion and application.
其他文献
目的 分析优质护理应用于腹部术后急性肠梗阻的临床效果?方法 对我院在2017年9月至2018年9个月开展腹部手术以后出现急性肠梗阻的76例患者以随机方法 分为观察组和对照组,每组38例?并分别对两组患者按照优质护理和常规护理的方法 实施护理,并比较不同护理后的效果?结果 ①经过不同护理之后,观察组的护理满意度为94.74%(36/38),P<0.05;分析观察两组患者首次排气时间?胃肠功能恢复时间?首次排便时间以及住院时间,观察组患者的各项时间指标,明显比对照组的78.95%(30/38)更高(P<0.0
目的 研究品管圈在护士癌痛知识培训中的实际应用成效?方法 于本院放疗科2018年5月至2020年4月在职护士中选取16名,将其随机划分为对照组(常规培训)与观察组(品管圈+常规培训),并先后对科室癌痛放疗患者给予护理服务,从护理满意度?综合能力测评结果 ?护理质量评分予以分析?结果 观察组与对照组护士中患者对护理行为的满意度分别为95.00%?80.00%;疼痛宣教(4.15±0.79)分?(3.67±0.56)分,疼痛随访(4.11±0.65)分?(3.44±0.45)分,疼痛动态评估(4.37±0.4