论文部分内容阅读
中国的古代词话常使用体会式的点评而少有系统性论述,往往具有多义性与模糊性,使我们在对其进行解读和运用时容易出现一些问题,如忽略词评家的整体词学观念,以偏概全;将具体的个评当作总评来用;偏重一面,忽视一句话的整体意思;为用而用,强加关联。除此之外,对于“本事”背景一类词话未加考证的利用也是当代词学研究中常常出现的一个问题。以韦庄词的研究为例,对这些误读和误用的情况加以分析。
Chinese ancient words often use the experience of style reviews and less systematical discourse, often with ambiguity and ambiguity, so that when we interpret and use it prone to some problems, such as ignoring the overall criticism Ci critics Concept, to the more general; the specific assessment as a general comment to use; emphasis on one side, ignoring the overall meaning of a sentence; for use and impose association. In addition, the unabashed use of words such as “skill” is also a common problem in the study of contemporary Ci-poetry. Taking the study of Wei Zhuang Ci as an example, we analyze these misunderstandings and misuses.