论文部分内容阅读
本文主要关心所谓苏格拉底式辩驳与羞耻感的关系。一种传统的解释认为,苏格拉底常常采取欺骗和反讽的手段来反驳其对手,使其产生一种负面和无益的羞耻感。本文希望重新解释苏格拉底式辩驳与羞耻感的关系。本文一方面尝试证明,柏拉图笔下的苏格拉底式辩驳作为对真理的共同探讨,是智者式辩驳的对立面;另一方面试图论证,苏格拉底式辩驳所关涉的是一种好的羞耻感,它应有助于人们对于真理的追求。
This article focuses primarily on the so-called Socratic rebuttal and shame. A traditional explanation is that Socrates often resort to deception and irony to disprove their opponents, giving them a sense of shame that is negative and useless. This article hopes to redefine the relationship between the Socratic rebuttal and the sense of shame. On the one hand, this article tries to prove that the platoon of Socrates as a common discussion of truth is the antithesis of the scholar-style rebuttal. On the other hand, the argument of Socratic refutation is a good sense of shame, It should help people pursue the truth.