二十世纪以来,学者们用西方学术框架整理国故,而墨子的“尚同”说,常被学者们解释为“专制主义”,进而被称作中国历史上“独裁与暴君的始作俑者”,受到严厉的批判。事实上如果把“尚同”学说置于墨子自身的“治道”理论框架之内,墨子“尚同”之说论及了基于共享价值观的组织整合与组织管理原则;而墨子对于“义”的设定,构成为“尚同”之说的正当性基石。 Since the twentieth century, scholars have used the Western academic framework to organize their national hometowns. However, Mohist’s theory of “Being Same” has often been interpreted by scholars as “authoritarianism” and then as the “initiator of tyranny and tyrant” in Chinese history , Was severely criticized. In fact, if “Shang Tong” theory is placed within Mozi’s own “governance” theory framework, Mohist “Shang Tong” refers to the principle of organizational integration and organization and management based on shared values; and Mohist’s theory of “ Justice ”, constitute the legitimacy cornerstone of“ Shang Tong ”.