论文部分内容阅读
恩格斯曾不止一次地把辩证法定义为“关于自然、人类社会和思维的运动和发展的普遍规律的科学”(《马克思恩格斯选集》第三卷255页、604页,第四卷223页)恩格斯的表述,基本上代表了马克思的观点,因为,众所周知,在两位理论家共同战斗的日子里,重大的理论问题总是相互切磋取得一致看法而后公诸于世的,这正如恩格斯本人在《反杜林论》第二版序言中所说的那样。在《自然辩证法》中,恩格斯把辩证法定义为“关于普遍联系的科学”(同上书,三卷565页)。表面上看,上述两种表述似乎并不相同,其实,本质上是一致的,因为,发展也就
Engels has more than once defined dialectics as “the science of the universal law of movement and development of nature, human society, and thinking” (Selected Works of Marx and Engels, vol. III, p. 255, p. 604, vol. Representation basically represents Marx’s point of view because, as we all know, in the days when the two theorists fought together, major theoretical issues were always unanimously agreed and then made public. As Engels himself said in “ Turin, ”the second edition of the preamble said. In “Dialectics of nature,” Engels defines dialectics as “science of universal connection” (ibid., Vol. 3, p. 565). On the surface, the above two expressions do not seem to be the same. Actually, they are essentially identical because development