《列子·周穆王》篇的“郑人有薪于野者”一段大发梦觉、真假、彼此、是非难辨之旨,其中尤为突出的是鹿之得失所伴随的梦觉难辨问题。原文并未在对立两者中最终下一明确判断,但这并不意味着混淆梦觉、无论对错,而是以此揭示出主体距离是非争执的尺度不同,梦觉所呈现的样态也随之而异。概言之,梦觉之辨依是非之争而起,是非之争则又导源于彼此之别。然而,彼此的对立只是在有限的范围内起作用,因为在更根本的意义上,人与人是相互感应唱和的。由此可见,那种就梦觉而言梦觉的思路是有很大局限的,可以说,梦觉问题的关键并不在梦觉的内容本身,而在于梦觉主体的层次与境界。 “Lie ZHOU Mu-wang” articles “Zhengren paid Yukito ” a period of great dreams, true and false, each other, is non-dubious purposes, of which the most prominent is the deer’s gains and losses accompanied by dream hard Identify the problem. The original text does not ultimately make the final determination between the two opposing sides, but this does not mean confusing dreams, no matter what is right or wrong, but revealing that the subject distance is a non-disparitiescale, It varies. In a word, dreams are based on the struggle between non-nonsense and non-contests on the other. However, the antagonisms of each other only work within a limited range, because in a more fundamental sense, people and people are interacting with each other. Thus, the kind of dreams in terms of dreams is a very limited way of thinking, it can be said that the dream is not the dream of the key content of the dream itself, but lies in the level and level dream body.