论文部分内容阅读
作者从四个方面对中国古代的情理论进行了分析与比较。首先，先秦儒家提出了善情、恶情、美情，道家则提出了真情说。其次，儒家在对待情感的态度上表现出由节情、禁情到灭情的变化；道家则由“无情”发展到“安情”、“任情”。再次，儒家诸子对性与情范畴作了较为明确的区分，而道家则大多强调性情如一，不可分离。最后，从道情关系的角度，揭示了儒家和道家视道出于情而又高于情，表现出其道德形上学既内在又超越的特点，道家之道是统摄天、地、人之大道、至道，道家之情也是大情至情。
The author analyzes and compares ancient Chinese love theory from four aspects. First of all, pre-Qin Confucianism put forward the goodwill, evil feelings and the beauty of the nation, while the Taoists put forward the true feelings. Second, Confucianism shows the change from festivity, forbiddance to fiery feelings in the attitude of treating emotions; while Taoism develops from “ruthlessness” to “tranquility” and “empathy”. Thirdly, Confucian philosophers made a clearer distinction between the sexual and the sexual categories, while the Taoists mostly emphasized their indifference and inseparability. Finally, from the perspective of the relationship between the sentiments and the sentiments, it reveals that the Confucianism and the Taoism show their own characteristics of being out of sentiment and above the sentiment and showing their moral metaphysics both intrinsic and transcendent. To the Tao, Taoist love is affectionate.