改性陶粒对水中卡马西平去除的动态吸附实验及模型

来源 :环境工程学报 | 被引量 : 0次 | 上传用户:wlh0403
下载到本地 , 更方便阅读
声明 : 本文档内容版权归属内容提供方 , 如果您对本文有版权争议 , 可与客服联系进行内容授权或下架
论文部分内容阅读
用CTMAB(十六烷三甲基溴化铵)对陶粒进行改性,以卡马西平(CBZ)为目标污染物,研究了吸附去除饮用水中CBZ的性能并探讨了其应用的可行性。通过滤料吸附去除CBZ的动态实验,发现改性陶粒的去除效果优于陶粒。进水CBZ浓度为2μg·L~(-1)时,改性陶粒对CBZ的去除率最高为50%,陶粒最高的去除率为40%。研究了滤料再生对吸附性能的影响,发现陶粒和改性陶粒对CBZ的去除均随再生次数的增加而降低,改性陶粒的去除效果仍优于陶粒,改性陶粒的使用期限更长久。讨论了修正前后的Thomas模型,推导得到能更准确描述穿透曲线的Thomas模型取值范围。滤料穿透曲线用原始Thomas模型能很好地计算的速率常数kTh和平衡吸附量q0。利用原始Thomas模型也能较为准确地预测滤柱的穿透时间。 The ceramsite was modified by CTMAB (hexadecane trimethyl ammonium bromide), CBZ was taken as the target pollutant, the adsorption and removal of CBZ in drinking water was studied and the feasibility of its application was discussed . The dynamic experiments of removal of CBZ by filter media showed that the removal of modified ceramsite was better than that of ceramsite. When CBZ concentration was 2μg · L -1, the removal rate of CBZ was 50% and that of ceramsite was 40%. The effect of filter media regeneration on adsorption properties was studied. It was found that the removal of CBZ by ceramsite and modified ceramsite decreased with the increase of regeneration times, and the removal efficiency of modified ceramsite was still better than that of ceramsite and modified ceramsite The use of more long-term. The Thomas model before and after modification is discussed and the range of Thomas model which can describe the penetration curve more accurately is deduced. The filter penetration curve can be well calculated using the original Thomas model for the rate constant kTh and equilibrium adsorption capacity q0. The original Thomas model can also predict the breakthrough time of the filter column more accurately.
其他文献
各权威机构对2016年的经济预测,没有一个是比2015年好的。  2016年实体经济依旧是冰火两重天,“火”的企业主要是在现代新兴产业领域,还有一些传统产业中坚定转型、积极升级的企业。“冰”的企业也不少,主要是处于落后产能和过剩产能的企业,而且这些企业故步自封,不转型或者转得太慢。  从2010年到2015年,经济增速在下行,但市场增量却在1000亿元左右。是哪些市场在增加?又是谁切走了谁的蛋糕?
经历去年一轮大学生创业热潮后,今年应届大学生在就业与创业的意向上有了一些明显的变化。据智联招聘最新发布的《2016年应届毕业生就业力调研报告》显示,2016年选择创业的应届毕业生比例同比下降一半;学历越高,选择就业的应届毕业生比重越大。有关专家分析认为,大学生选择创业的比例之所以回落,原因在于,他们毕业后,还没有做好创业的心理准备。  创业要“有备而来”  其实,大学生创业热情高并不是件坏事,但是