论文部分内容阅读
不管一个人是抱着科学的态度,或固执地持有某种宗派观点。所有人总会对一种东西怀有边缘化的共识——仅有意识在目前看来是可以和物质并列存在或是分庭抗礼的。这种共识的表现就是,意识是一个有别于物质性、有意义的二类话题,是可以广泛供人们谈论的对象和领域。对于物质的认识,自然科学取得了长足的进步,但对于意识的认识,人们却停留在原地。生物学,医学,心理学,社会学等学科虽然都在各自的领域得出了一些有关意识的重要观点,但仔细翻阅这些不同学科的研究成果,就会发现这些成果有这样一些特点:零碎却没有关联,细致却没有归类,表象却没有还原等。这种特点的明显结果就是:几乎没有人可以通过对意识的全面分析来合理解释人的一切行为活动。不得不承认,到目前为止,人们对于感性,理性,记忆,想象,心灵等概念的认识仍旧是含混不清的。
Whether a person holds a scientific attitude or stubbornly holds a sectarian perspective. All people always have a marginalized consensus on something-only consciousness, at the moment, can exist in parallel with matter or can be circumvented. The expression of this consensus is that consciousness is a kind of topic that is different from materiality and meaningful. It is a subject and field that can be widely discussed by people. For the understanding of matter, great progress has been made in the natural sciences, but people are still in the spotlight about their awareness. Although the disciplines such as biology, medicine, psychology and sociology have drawn some important notions of awareness in their respective fields, a careful review of the research results of these different disciplines reveals that these achievements have such features as fragmentation No association, meticulous but not classified, the appearance has not been restored. The obvious result of this trait is that few people can reasonably explain all human behavior through a comprehensive analysis of consciousness. Have to admit, so far, people’s perception of sensibility, reason, memory, imagination, mind and other concepts are still vague.