保守党的英国对外政策和工党的英国对外政策在基本上是一致的。在这次竞选中,两党在它们所提出的政纲中对于某些基本问题所表示的态度彼此没有什么不同,尤其对于英国因进行庞大的扩军计划而招致经济的和政治的危机这个事实避而不提,就是明证。正如极端反动的英国大资本家喉舌‘旁观者’週刊所承认的: ‘在基本问题方面,例如与英联邦国家的团结,与美国的团结,与大西洋公约国家的团结,对联合国的支持等等,保守党、工党和自由党内的大多数群众的态度都是一致的。’(一九五一年十月二十六日该刊社论) 但在保守党上台之后,根据保守党的言论和近来的情况显示,英国的对外政策在重点、方法和实现的形式上大概将会和工党的政策有所不同。这首先将表现在保守党政府更加澈底地执行华尔街的命令,更进一步地将英国(?)在美帝国主义的战车上面。遠今年五月,邱吉尔在英国下院中就曾表示: Conservative British foreign policy and Labor’s British foreign policy are basically the same. In the campaign, the positions the bipartisans expressed in regard to certain fundamental issues in their political platform are no different from each other, especially the fact that the United Kingdom incurred economic and political crises as a result of the massive arms expansion program No mention is proof. Just as the weekly “Bystander Weekly”, the ultra-reactionary British big capitalist mouthpiece, admits: ’On basic issues such as solidarity with Commonwealth countries, solidarity with the United States, solidarity with the Atlantic countries, support for the United Nations, etc., The majority of the Conservative, Labor and Liberal parties have the same attitude. However, following the Conservatives’ assumption of office, according to the Conservatives remarks and recent developments, Britain’s foreign policy will, in the form of emphasis, methods and implementation, be approximately It will be different from Labor’s policy. This will first be manifested in the more complete implementation of the orders from Wall Street by the Conservative government and the further expansion of Britain into the chariot of US imperialism. In May of this year, Churchill once said in the English lower house: