熊十力于后期肯定了本体具有物质性,并对孔子之外的历代儒者予以批评。他的这些变化,引起了学界的关注。学界对熊氏后期思想变化原因的阐释,可谓是聚讼纷纭。但大多数海内外学者都是从意识形态的角度来探讨的,并未能真正揭示熊十力后期思想变化的内在理路。黄克剑先生提出熊十力后期思想的变化是在坚持“体用不二”的观点基础上为更好的实现“返本开新”的文化主张,对既有思路的调整,即从前期的“举体成用”转变为后期的“摄体归用”。本文沿着这一思路对熊十力后期思想的变与不变作了分辨,并对熊氏后期思想变化的原因予以切近真际的阐释。 Xiong Shi Li later affirmed the material substance of the ontology and criticized Confucians outside the Confucian history for many generations. His changes have drawn the attention of academic circles. The explanation of the reasons for the change of thought in the later period of the Xiong scholars can be described as the divergence of lawsuits. However, most scholars both at home and abroad have explored from an ideological point of view and have failed to truly reveal the inner logic of Xiong’s late ideological changes. Mr. Huang Kejian put forward that the change of Xiong’s ideas in his later period is based on the viewpoint of upholding “learning the best ” “Move body into use ” into the latter “body ”. Along the way, this dissertation resolves the change and change of Xiong’s later thoughts, and explains the reason of the later thought of Xiong’s.