论文部分内容阅读
目的 :评价两种根管治疗仪在根管治疗术中的临床疗效。方法:将我科2012年1月—2013年8月前牙需做根管治疗患者280例随机分为两组,各140例。使用森田SM-DP-ZX根管治疗仪为治疗组;登士柏X-SMART根管治疗仪为对照组。观察对比两组根充术后疗效。结果:两种不同根管治疗仪术后反应、根充效果、手术时间对比,差异无统计学意义。P>0.05。结论:使用多功能根管治疗仪森田SM-DP-ZX和登士柏X-SMART行根管预备手术,都具有省时省力,安全性高,术后反应低,根充效果佳的优点,两种根管治疗仪临床疗效相近,可任选一种。
Objective: To evaluate the clinical efficacy of two kinds of root canal therapy instruments in root canal therapy. Methods: Two hundred and twenty patients undergoing root canal therapy from January 2012 to August 2013 in our department were randomly divided into two groups (140 cases each). The Morita SM-DP-ZX root canal therapy instrument was used as the treatment group; the Dentsply X-SMART root canal therapy instrument was used as the control group. Observed and compared the efficacy of two groups after root filling. Results: There was no significant difference in postoperative response, root filling effect and operation time between the two kinds of root canal therapy instruments. P> 0.05. Conclusions: The multi-functional root canal therapy instrument Morita SM-DP-ZX and Dentsply X-SMART can provide the advantages of saving time and labor, high safety, low postoperative reaction and good rooting effect. Clinical efficacy of two kinds of root canal treatment instrument is similar, can choose one.